France
A Flawed Strategy
Jan 05, 2006

Eric Chaney (from Amsterdam)

During his seasonal greetings to the press, President Chirac revealed that he had asked the cabinet to review the tax base of employers' social contributions.  Currently, employers' contributions are based on gross wages.  These contributions are funding various welfare funds (healthcare — pensions — family), which, taken together, absorb a larger share of GDP than the central government itself (24.6% of GDP vs. 22.9%).  Mr. Chirac wants to shift the tax base from gross wages to value added (a concept close to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA), in order to boost employment and, it is hoped, to prevent companies from moving jobs offshore.  Although most details of this major tax change are still unknown — Mr. Chirac should be more explicit in his greetings to other constituencies in the following days, but the relevant details are likely to come much later on — the idea of a value-added based contribution is not new.  I believe that the economics behind this proposition are deeply flawed and that, sadly, it may destroy good jobs in the future, instead of protecting French workers.
 In This Issue
France
A Flawed Strategy
View GEF Archive

The change in the tax base would increase the taxation of profits and reduce the taxation of labour

Although neutral for the overall tax burden by definition, this change would move the cursor from a purely labour-based tax to a mixed one.  Since total compensation takes roughly two-thirds of value added (67.6% was the exact number in 2004) and profits (as measured by the gross operating surplus) one third, the arithmetic for the average company is relatively straightforward.  In short:

Ø      A €1 tax on payrolls would be replaced by a 66 cents tax on payrolls and 33 cents on gross operating surplus (operating profits).

Ø      The average value-added based contribution rate should be 17.4% (on my own estimate).

Ø      The implicit corporate tax rate (based on gross operating surplus) would rise from 13.6% to 31.0% (my own estimate).

Ø      The implicit employers' payroll tax rate would be cut from 25.8% to 17.4% (my own estimate).

Note that the average (or implicit) employers' payroll tax rate is lower than the headline rate (25.8% vs. 28.5%) because various tax breaks are applied to low wages.

The reform may penalize capital intensive industries relatively to labour-intensive ones.

The 2/3 vs. 1/3 breakdown between compensation and profits holds for the mythical average company only.  In the real corporate world, companies are more or less labour intensive.  For capital-intensive companies and sectors, the relative shares of capital and labour are likely to be more evenly distributed.  Hence, the overall tax burden may rise for these sectors while, conversely, labour intensive companies may benefit from a lighter tax burden.

The logic of the reform is political and short sighted.   If implemented, it would backfire in the long term

In the short term, fixed capital is less mobile than labour: although laying off workers in France is difficult and costly, it is nevertheless easier and less costly than to shut down plants and offices in order to relocate elsewhere.  Accordingly, moving the tax cursor from labour to capital may be positive for employment in the short term, in theory at least.  However, in the medium to long term, capital is more mobile than employment.  Hence a higher profit tax will result in capital outflows (foreign direct investment).  In my view, by reducing the stock of producing capital in France, this policy may eventually harm employment, especially in capital-intensive industries, which also happen to be the most innovative.

A surprising political move, at odds with globalization

As I see it, President Chirac's surprising burst in the economic policy arena, normally a job for the Prime Minister or the Minister of Finances, may give a clue about his personal ambitions regarding the 2007 presidential election, after last year’s political debacles (the rejection of the EU Treaty and the riots).  Either Mr. Chirac might be considering running for a third mandate, or he might want to smooth the ground for his protégé Dominique de Villepin.  The value-added-based social contribution was seriously considered by previous left-wing cabinets and is part of the socialist platform.  Because it fits with an old socialist mantra "taxing capital creates jobs", this move may be aimed at luring left leaning voters.

The problem is that it is unlikely to be effective even in the short run, because of regulatory impediments to job creation in labour intensive industries (such as retail trade for instance) and, in the end, will simply result into capital outflows.  Globalization is still about capital mobility above all, labour mobility coming as a very distant issue.  I am afraid that penalizing capital to keep jobs at home is a hopeless strategy.

 





Important Disclosure Information at the end of this Forum

Disclosure Statement

The information and opinions in this report were prepared or are disseminated by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and/or Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited and/or Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd. and/or Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia Limited and/or Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H) and/or Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, Taipei Branch and/or Morgan Stanley & Co International Limited, Seoul Branch, and/or Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited (A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services licence No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or JM Morgan Stanley Securities Private Limited and their affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley").

Global Research Conflict Management Policy

This research observes our conflict management policy, available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/conflictpolicies.

Important Disclosures

This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages them to seek a financial adviser's advice. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. This report is not an offer to buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, securities prices or market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized.

With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, reports prepared by Morgan Stanley research personnel are based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change apart from when we intend to discontinue research coverage of a company. Facts and views in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel.

To our readers in Taiwan: This publication is distributed by Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, Taipei Branch; it may not be distributed to or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong; if you have any queries concerning it, contact our Hong Kong sales representatives.

This publication is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd.; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of, and has agreed to take responsibility for, the contents of this publication in Canada; in Germany by Morgan Stanley Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, regulated by Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that this document has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the United States by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Morgan Stanley DW Inc., which accept responsibility for its contents. Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, authorized and regulated by Financial Services Authority, disseminates in the UK research that it has prepared, and approves solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, research which has been prepared by any of its affiliates. Private U.K. investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited representative about the investments concerned. In Australia, this report, and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act.

Trademarks and service marks herein are their owners' property. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of their data and shall not have liability for any damages relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P. Morgan Stanley bases projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies regarding the MSCI Country Index Series solely on public information. MSCI has not reviewed, approved or endorsed these projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies. Morgan Stanley has no influence on or control over MSCI's index compilation decisions. This report or portions of it may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley research is disseminated and available primarily electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form. Additional information on recommended securities is available on request.

 Inside GEF
Feedback
Global Economic Team
Japan Economic Forum
 GEF Archive
 Webcasts & Podcasts
Stephen Roach
Weekly Commentary
Stephen S. Roach is a Managing Director and Chief Economist of Morgan Stanley.
View this week's Webcast
The password for this webcast is "roach".

You can view this webcast using Windows Media Player, RealPlayer, or your telephone.
 Search Our Views